Posted by
Sidney Allen Johnson on Wednesday, August 08, 2007 8:29:36 PM
THE SCIENCE OF DENYING GOD
There is a threat in our world, the likes of which we have never seen
before. All of civilization hangs in the balance and the actions taken,
or not taken, by those of us alive today will determine whether or not
we will have a future. Is the government or the media leading the
charge to solve this problem? No! They are more interested in promoting
a gathering of wackadoo musicians and actors doing a series of concerts
to promote the fraudulent cause of "man made global warming." Real flesh
and blood enemies are working to bring more terrorism and death to us.
Yet we are constantly told that the threat of terrorism is being
overblown by an unpopular presidential administration. The war on
terror is nothing more than a bumper sticker slogan. It is the threat
of catastrophic climate change that is the real danger...And the
children shall lead.
Now just what exactly is Global
Warming? (Also known as global climate change). That the earth appears
to be warming, at least relative to recent history, is possible, if not
a "consensus" fact. The real question at hand is whether or not any of
this supposed warming has anything to do with manmade industrial
emissions. The idea being that these greenhouse gases, particularly CO2
(carbon dioxide), are causing the atmosphere to heat up. Carbon Dioxide
is a natural occurring ingredient. Plants need it to survive and as
they consume it they in turn put oxygen in the air. This has been the
natural order of things since the beginning. Carbon Dioxide is called a
"greenhouse gas" because it absorbs and redirects infrared radiation
from the sun. Simply put, the more CO2 molecules we have in the air, the hotter the air should be...but then again maybe its not so simple.
In 1996 the United Nations issued a report stating that Global Warming
was a fact, yet before releasing the report two key paragraphs were
deleted. Those two paragraphs, written by the scientists who did the
actual scientific analysis stated: A. "None of the studies cited above
has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed climate
change to increases in greenhouse gases" B. "No study to date has
positively attributed all or part of the climate change to man made
causes.
Contrary to the lies you have heard...THERE IS NO
"SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS" THAT GLOBAL WARMING WILL CAUSE DAMAGING CLIMATE
CHANGE!. There is also NO "scientific consensus" that man made emissions
are the cause of the warming of the earth, or more importantly, that
any actions taken by mankind have or will have any effect on the
situation. We know that in the past the climate of the earth has been
both colder AND warmer. At the time the Vikings were making settlements
in Greenland and North America the climate was suitable for the farming
that sustained their colonies. When the warmer climate left in favor of
a cooler one, so did the Vikings. The fact is, we cannot even be
certain that the climate, as it stands now, is even the most desirable
one.
The current projections from the proponents of global
warming claim that the earth may warm 2 to 3 degrees celsius by 2100AD.
This may sound impressive until you consider that meteorological
predictions are fraught with more variables than virtually any other
kind of science. This is especially true when taken on a planetary
scale where everything affects the result. Just look at your local
newspaper. Check the seven day forecast and see how accurate it is.
These things are almost always wrong and they are based on a local area
with fewer variables. How can any reasonable person put any faith on a
planetary forecast set over 100 years? Let alone the dire consequences
of melting polar icecaps, rising sea levels, intensified storms and
droughts that the fear mongers of this movement would have us believe.
Half of this century's global warming occurred between 1900 and 1945.
If manmade Carbon Dioxide emissions are responsible why wasn't there a
greater increase in temperature in the second half of the century?
After all, fossil fuel emissions more than doubled in that time.
Manmade carbon dioxide accounts for only 5% of the total of all carbon
dioxide in the atmosphere. Thats right 5%! The rest comes from natural
sources such dying vegetation (rotting wood) and volcanoes...the
earth's own smokestack. Volcanic activity can add more greenhouse gases
into the atmosphere in a few weeks than every internal combustion
engine on the planet has over the last decade. Think about that.
Termites and other insects are a larger source of greenhouse emissions
than all the industrial plants in the civilized world! Yet it is the
oceans that are most responsible since the primary greenhouse gas is
not carbon dioxide or methane but....water vapor. Human activity does
not add water vapor to the atmosphere. However, warmer air can hold
much more moisture which can increase temperatures and intensify the
effects of climate change. There are even those who dare to suggest
that increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are the
result of, not the cause of, Global Warming.
There is also
a cadre of scientists who attribute the warming of the earth to
increased solar activity. Dr Sami Solanki, the director of the renowned
Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research in Gottingen, Germany,
has said: "The Sun has been at its strongest over the past 60 years and
may now be affecting global temperatures." To determine the Sun's role
in global warming, Dr Solanki's research team measured sunspots, which
are believed to intensify the Sun's energy output. The team studied
sunspot data going back several hundred years. They found that a dearth
of sunspots signaled a cold period, which could last up to 50 years,
but that over the past century their numbers had increased as the
Earth's climate grew steadily warmer. The scientists also compared data
from ice samples collected in Greenland. The most recent samples
contained the lowest recorded levels of beryllium 10 for more than
1,000 years. Beryllium 10 is a particle created by cosmic rays that
decreases in the Earth's atmosphere as the magnetic energy from the Sun
increases.
Combine that with the reports from NASA that say
Mars has warmed by about 0.5C since the 1970s. This is similar to the
warming experienced on Earth over approximately the same period. This
would appear to suggest that rapid changes in planetary climates could
be a natural phenomena. Unless, of course, you believe that the ultra
conservative corporate Martians are pursuing a policy of unregulated
industrial development. Damned extraterrestrials!
If that
isn't enough to throw the "scientific consensus" into question there is
also the matter of the natural ability of the earth to compensate for
changes in the atmosphere. For example, when carbon dioxide levels in
the atmosphere increase, plant life on the planet experiences an
increase in its growth rate. This has the effect of CONSUMING more
carbon dioxide and converting it into oxygen. The more carbon dioxide,
the faster the plants grow and the more carbon dioxide that is removed.
Sounds almost like somebody had foreseen this possibility and designed a
system to account for that. Who do you reckon that was?
All
of this has to be accounted for in any model about climate change. All
of these factors and the long periods of time involved will wreak havoc
on any forecasts of global doom. You could call them..."inconvenient
facts." Reasonable people have good reasons to question the so called
"scientific consensus" of the followers of the "Church Of The Global
Apocalypse." Now if you haven't heard any of these arguments before
then you are NOT informed...because someone doesn't want you informed.
There are two kinds of science. In one kind of science, the scientists
look at the facts and conduct experiments. They report on the results
and other scientists can reproduce the conditions of the experiments
and therefore reproduce the results. This has the effect of verifying
the validity of the conclusions. In the other kind of science, the
scientist KNOWS what outcome he desires and he creates the data needed
to to generate the results that will validate those preordained
conclusions. He then collaborates with other like minded scientists to
claim there is a "scientific consensus" and suppress any debate on the
issue. These scientists tend to be dependent on grants from people
whose agenda is enhanced by the outcomes of this "science."
So what is the true driving force behind the great Global Warming
Swindle? It is nothing more than a great socialist attempt to
redistribute the wealth of the United States to the rest of the world.
It was never about the supposed catastrophic consequences of a global
climate change. It is all about money and control. If you are
suspicious of that assertion then take as an example the infamous Kyoto
Protocols that the United States currently has, thus far, wisely not
signed onto. Even if we were to assume, for the sake of argument, that
the apocalyptic global climate models were correct it would have NO
measurable effect on carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere because it
imposes no restrictions on major developing countries like China and
India. Those countries have made it clear they will not now, nor in the
future, agree to, or adhere to, any such restrictions. Yet the world
clamors over the United States failure to agree to the treaty. Why?
Because the United States, or more accurately, the United States money,
was always the objective. It was just another attempt to bring the
United States in line with the socialist leanings of the majority of
the world. Yes my friends, you can say the words...New World Order.
According to the Wharton Econometric Forecasting Associates,
implementing the Kyoto restrictions in the United States would cost the
average family $225.00 a month! And thats on the lowest end of possible
emissions restrictions that could be placed on the United States if we
acquiesce to the Kyoto Protocols. Emission reduction proposals hurt the
poorest hardest. Full implementation of the Kyoto Protocols would cost
the United States no less than 4,000,000 jobs with absolutely NO
measurable effect on reducing temperatures, and yet there are
eco-terrorists who would dare to extort more from us if we were foolish
enought to allow it. Alarmists such as Al Gore have suggested nothing
short of the abolition of the automobile itself. The United States is
always at the center of these grandiose apocalyptic measures.
Apparently we are expected to finance the entire project. This is in
spite of the fact that the United States already leads the world in
both the developement and implementation of emission restriction
technology.
You would think that a clean burning technology
like nuclear power would be desireable as an alternative to the fossil
fuel burning power plants that generate greenhouse gases. However, the
people who align themselves with the Global Warming alarmists are the
same people who oppose the expanded use of nuclear power. There hasn't
been construction on a new nuclear power plant in over 20 years. Why?
Because by eliminating fuel alternatives they put you at their mercy to
pay extravagant penalties for the fuels you consume as well as gain
greater control of your freedom of movement. Once again we see money
and control as the true source of their motivations.
There
is also the matter of the penalizing/money acquisition scheme they
refer to as "carbon offsets." These are the dirty little devices that
allow you to pay for the priviledge of dispersing carbon into the
atmosphere. They refer to each individual's personal carbon dioxide
responsibility as a "carbon footprint." Carbon Offsets essentially
operate in the same manner as the infamous indulgences that were once
sold by the Catholic Church. In that despicable scheme, absolution for
sins could literally be purchased for a price. And of course, sin was
for sale on a progressive scale based on the particular sin you were
buying. This was at the very core of reasons that led to the Protestant
Reformation. It was a policy that obviously allowed the rich to avoid
any real spiritual responsibility or commitment to their religion. Now
the religion of Global Warming is resurrecting this policy for its own
quick cash grab. For Al Gore or any of the musicians and actors that
participated in the recent Live Aid concerts this is no big deal. After
all these are the wealthy and, in their minds at least, the elite. They
can, and will, continue to live frivolously as they use their political
influence to find ways to coerce the rest of us into footing the bill.
Ultimately it always comes down to that.
I recently watched
an episode of the Today show on NBC and Lester Holt had one of these
"green" experts come in and analyze his personal "carbon footprint."
Since he travels a lot by jet plane, he had a sizeable one. Iit was
therefore suggested that he compensate for this by "donating" money to
organizations that do things to "work against the effects" of carbon
emissions. Basically these groups go around planting trees and
organizing rock concerts that themselves generate huge carbon
footprints. I was impressed that Mr. Holt could keep a straight face
through the whole experience. Currently this farce about carbon offsets
is built around creating a "guilt complex" in the more sensitive
members of the citizenry and is therefore voluntary. However, the
Global Warming Gestapo is not interested in volunteers, they are
looking for legislation. Unfortunately in the current congressional
climate they will find this an easy task to accomplish. They desire to
levy a heavy tax on such things as gasoline, jet fuel, coal etc. as
well as insist on emission controls on vehucles that will add thousands
of dollars to their prices. All these guaranteed economy busting ideas
will be viewed by a democratically controlled congress as new revenue
with which to finance their own socialist schemes such as a national
health care system. So you can see how one bad idea feeds into another
one. Then of course there is the ever present desire to limit your
freedoms and control every facet of your life through government
regulation. All these things will combine to severely limit your
freedom of movement and crippling the economy will destroy your way of
life as you know it. The greatest misconception of this whole scheme is
the idea that the government must act now...and drastically.
And yet, I would tell you there is even something more sinister than
that afoot here. All these things are merely man made manifestations of
an even greater conspiracy against you. As always there is something
deeper and more spiritual involved. Brilliant conspiracies of this
magnitude are above the abilities of disagreeable men to carry out in
spite of their sincerely malevolent intentions. Too many people are
involved. Politicians, actors, musicians, activists and other assorted
"do gooders" don't come together this way on their own. There is a
guiding hand, or should I say, a guiding spirit:
Ephesians 6:12 For
we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities,
against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world,
against spiritual wickedness in high places.
There
are verses in the Bible's book of Revelation that have always made me
wonder about the people in the end times. Their behavior, as described,
always seemed a little strange to me. It is these principalities and
powers in high places that are truly at work here. And they are
fulfilling a great purpose right before our eyes...if only we will see
it:
Revelation 16:8-9 And the
fourth angel poured out his vial upon the sun; and power was given unto
him to scorch men with fire. And men were scorched with great heat, and
blasphemed the name of God, which hath power over these plagues: and
they repented not to give him glory.
I have
always wondered how people in the midst of such great misery could
blaspheme the name of the God that possessed their only hope for mercy.
I always had a problem believing that anyone could have that much
hatred for God. But then again it isn't really hatred so much as it is
arrogance. The Global Warming hoax has a greater purpose. Even as these
hypocritical activists bombard us with their fraudulent alarmist claims
of impending disaster they are unwittingly indoctrinating and
conditioning the population to blaspheme God precisely as those verses
describe. We are being indoctrinated and conditioned to believe that
such matters as the climate are actually under OUR control. We are
denying God. Just as Charles Darwin's false science has convinced many
they are just the random result of of evolution from an ape, so too
will Global Warming convince many that they, and not God, are the
masters of the earth's climate. If the theory of evolution is designed
to indoctrinate and condition mankind to deny God the creator, then
Global Warming is designed to indoctrinate and condition us to deny
God's continuing role in the earth's affairs. That has always been one
of the goals of the very first conspirator...a certain angel actively
working for the destruction of us all. Global Warming is not the
science of catastrophic climate change. It is the science of denying
God.